FREEDOM

PLEASE DONATE ==>>

YOUR SUPPORT WILL HELP ME TO KEEP GOING

LINK TO EYE ON THE WORLD BELOW

LINK TO EYE ON THE USA BELOW

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

“A free people [claim] their rights as derived from the laws of nature, and not as the gift of their chief magistrate.”

-Thomas Jefferson

“Each State, in ratifying the Constitution, is considered as a sovereign body, independent of all others, and only to be bound by its own voluntary act. In this relation, then, the new Constitution will, if established, be a FEDERAL, and not a NATIONAL constitution.”

-James Madison

1. Rights are innate to man, not granted by the government.

2. Local politics are the best politics, because the public has more control over them (the basis for a Republic over a Democracy).

“A republic is the best of governments.”

-John Adams

“Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner.”

The Story of Your Enslavement

ZEITGEIST II ADDENDUM (FULL MOVIE!)

This was written by Ben Franklin,"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."

"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." -- Thomas Jefferson

Thomas Jefferson said, “I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.

http://www.lp.org/ THE LIBERTARIAN PARTY

Muse - Uprising [OFFICIAL VIDEO]

LINK TO EYE ON NORWAY BELOW

1. We will NOT obey orders to disarm the American people.

2. We will NOT obey orders to conduct warrantless searches of the American people

3. We will NOT obey orders to detain American citizens as “unlawful enemy combatants” or to subject them to military tribunal.

4. We will NOT obey orders to impose martial law or a “state of emergency” on a state.

5. We will NOT obey orders to invade and subjugate any state that asserts its sovereignty.

6. We will NOT obey any order to blockade American cities, thus turning them into giant concentration camps.

7. We will NOT obey any order to force American citizens into any form of detention camps under any pretext.

8. We will NOT obey orders to assist or support the use of any foreign troops on U.S. soil against the American people to “keep the peace” or to “maintain control."

9. We will NOT obey any orders to confiscate the property of the American people, including food and other essential supplies.

10.We will NOT obey any orders which infringe on the right of the people to free speech, to peaceably assemble, and to petition their government for a redress of grievances.

JOIN AND SUPPORT THE OATHKEEPERS

Stewart is the founder and Director of Oath Keepers. He served as a U.S. Army paratrooper until disabled in a rough terrain parachuting accident during a night jump.

He is a former firearms instructor and former member of Rep. Ron Paul’s DC staff.

Stewart currently writes the monthly Enemy at the Gates column for S.W.A.T. Magazine

Stewart graduated from Yale Law School in 2004, where his paper “Solving the Puzzle of Enemy Combatant Status” won Yale’s Miller prize for best paper on the Bill of Rights. He assisted teaching U.S. military history at Yale, was a Yale Research Scholar, and is writing a book on the dangers of applying the laws of war to the American people.

CIA Officer Explains New World Order's Demise

Fully Informed Jury Association (FIJA)>>>

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Tenth Amendment (Amendment X)

THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT'S POWER MUST BE CHALLENGED BY THE STATES UNDER THE

No person shall be held to answer for any capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

THE FEDERAL PATRIOT ACT ALONG WITH OTHER SUCH ANTI TERRORISM LAWS ARE DESIGNED TO VIOLATE AND CIRCUMVENT THE 5TH AMENDMENT

THERE'S A WAR ON FOR YOUR MIND, SO HERE' S WHERE TO FIND MENTAL AMMUNITION

SEARCH FOR BOOKS ABOUT THE WORLD WIDE CONSPIRACY BELOW

IT'S THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NOT THE FEDERAL STATES OF AMERICA

SEARCH -> We Are Change

THIS PICTURE IS A LINK TO MY CRYSTAL SKULL PROPHECY PAGES

“In questions of powers, then, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution.” – Thomas Jefferson

Oliver North questioned on Continuity of Govt

E-MAIL ME AT: magnetomaniac@yahoo.com

You may also join my group in order to submit your suggestions and anything else that you would like to add to my website that would be helpful

PAGE WILL BE UPDATED AS MORE DETAILS ARE DEVELOPED. IF YOU HAVE ANY INPUT PLEASE USE THE E-MAIL ADDRESS BELOW

IF YOU ARE AN INVESTOR OR JUST A WELL FUNDED ENTITY PLEASE EMAIL ME IF YOU WISH TO TALK ABOUT BRINGING THIS OR ANY OF MY UNPUBLISHED IDEAS TO THE MARKETPLACE

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Monday, May 11, 2009
A writer who was collecting material for a fictional book based around the premise that top Nazis, seeking to preserve their power at the end of the second world war, conspired to create a Fourth Reich under the auspices of the European Union, actually discovered documents proving the plot to be true.

In a Daily Mail piece, Adam Lebor reveals how he uncovered US Military Intelligence report EW-Pa 128, also known as The Red House Report, which details how top Nazis secretly met at the Maison Rouge Hotel in Strasbourg on August 10, 1944 and, knowing Germany was on the brink of military defeat, conspired to create a Fourth Reich – a pan-European economic empire based around a European common market.

Top Nazi industrialists were ordered by SS Obergruppenfuhrer Dr Scheid to set up front companies abroad and pose as democrats in order to achieve economic penetration and lay the foundations for the re-emergence of the Nazi party.

“The Third Reich was defeated militarily, but powerful Nazi-era bankers, industrialists and civil servants, reborn as democrats, soon prospered in the new West Germany. There they worked for a new cause: European economic and political integration,” writes Lebor.

Wealthy Nazi industrialists like Alfried Krupp of Krupp Industries and Friedrich Flick, as well as front companies like BMW, Siemens and Volkswagen, set about the task of building a new pan-European business empire. According to historian Dr Michael Pinto-Duschinsky, an adviser to Jewish former slave labourers, “For many leading industrial figures close to the Nazi regime, Europe became a cover for pursuing German national interests after the defeat of Hitler….The continuity of the economy of Germany and the economies of post-war Europe is striking. Some of the leading figures in the Nazi economy became leading builders of the European Union.”

Banking titan Hermann Abs, who joined board of Deutsche Bank during the rise of Nazis, also sat on the supervisory board of I.G. Farben, the company that made the Zyklon B gas used to kill concentration camp victims. “Abs was put in charge of allocating Marshall Aid – reconstruction funds – to German industry. By 1948 he was effectively managing Germany’s economic recovery,” writes Lebor.

“Crucially, Abs was also a member of the European League for Economic Co-operation, an elite intellectual pressure group set up in 1946. The league was dedicated to the establishment of a common market, the precursor of the European Union.”

The European League for Economic Co-operation developed policies for European integration that almost mirrored those proposed by Nazis just years previously.

In his book “Europe’s Full Circle,” Rodney Atkinson provides a list of policies proposed by Nazis and their similarity to today’s European Union.

    • Europaische Wirtshaftsgemeinschaft
    • European Economic Community
    • European Currency System
    • European Exchange Rate Mechanism
    • Europabank (Berlin)
    • European Central Bank (Frankfurt)
    • European Regional Principle
    • Committee of the Regions
    • Common Labour Policy
    • Social Chapter
    • Economic and Trading Agreements
    • Single Market

“Is it possible that the Fourth Reich those Nazi industrialists foresaw has, in some part at least, come to pass?” asks Lebor.

“These three typewritten pages are a reminder that today’s drive towards a European federal state is inexorably tangled up with the plans of the SS and German industrialists for a Fourth Reich – an economic rather than military imperium.”
As we have highlighted in the past, Nazism and the EU have some very disturbing parallels. Indeed, the two are fundamentally intertwined and the origins of the EU can be traced directly back to the Nazis.

The foundations for the EU and ultimately the Euro single currency were laid by the secretive Bilderberg Group in the mid-1950’s. Bilderberg’s owned leaked documents prove that the agenda to create a European common market and a single currency were formulated by Bilderberg in 1955. One of the group’s principle founders was H. Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, a former Nazi SS officer.
But the ideological framework for the European Union goes back even further, to the 1940’s when top Nazi economists and academics outlined the plan for a single European economic community, an agenda that was duly followed after the end of the second world war.

In his 1940 book The European Community, Nazi Economics Minister and war criminal Walther Funk wrote about the need to create a “Central European Union” and “European Economic Area” and for fixed exchange rates, stating “No nation in Europe can achieve on its own the highest level of economic freedom which is compatible with all social requirements…The formation of very large economic areas follows a natural law of development….interstate agreements in Europe will control [economic forces generally]…There must be a readiness to subordinate one’s own interests in certain cases to those of [the EC].”

Funk’s co-authors echoed his sentiments. Nazi academic Heinrich Hunke wrote, “Classic national economy..is dead…community of fate which is the European economy…fate and extent of European co-operation depends on a new unity economic plan”.

Fellow Nazi Gustav Koenig observed, “We have a real European Community task before us…I am convinced that this Community effort will last beyond the end of the war.”

In 1940, Minister of Propaganda Joseph Goebbels ordered the creation of the “large-scale economic unification of Europe,” believing that “in fifty years’ time [people would] no longer think in terms of countries.” Just 53 years later, the European Union in its current form was established.

Other top Nazis who called for the creation of a pan-European federal economic superstate include
Ribbentrop, Quisling and Seyss-Inquart, who spoke of “The new Europe of solidarity and co-operation among all its people… will find…rapidly increasing prosperity once national economic boundaries are removed.”

Such rhetoric would not look out of place at a present day Bilderberg, Trilateral Commission or CFR confab.

The Nazis killed people who spoke out against the Third Reich, whereas the EU has implemented an altogether more efficient solution – simply kill their free speech instead.

A Dutch MP was recently refused entry to Britainbecause his political opinions were deemed offensive under EU laws. Euro MP’s have consistently attempted to ban the “dangerous and unregulated blogosphere” in an attempt to shut down free speech on the Internet. Under the 1999 ruling of the European Court Of Justice (case 274/99), it is illegal to criticize the EU and the EU is on a mission to outlaw any national political parties that do not pander to the European federal superstate agenda.

Most of the individuals who hold the reigns of power in the European Union are not Nazis, indeed, they probably believe themselves to be fair-minded liberals working for the “greater good”. However, the European Union by its very nature is totalitarian, because it seeks to remove power from national governments accountable to their electorate and centralize it into the hands of supra-national entities that are accountable to nobody but themselves. It also seeks to remove the right of free speech for anyone in a position of influence who criticizes this agenda.

The fact that the EU was a brainchild of top Nazi economists and industrialists, formulated as a means of preserving dictatorial power and then implemented by a former Nazi working under the auspices of the Bilderberg Group in 1955, proves that the entire European Union system is poisoned with a legacy and a raison d’être of totalitarianism.

This is becoming increasingly obvious in the 21st century as popular social movements across Europe rise up to oppose the blatant power grab being undertaken by the EU via the Lisbon Treaty, which will again be put before Irish voters later this year despite them already rejecting it in a national referendum, which prevented the treaty from being enforced.

VENUS PROJECT WOO WOO

THE VENUS PROJECT

'During a Feb. 3 hearing before the House Intelligence Committee, Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair testified that the U.S. intelligence community, when dealing with direct terrorist threats to the United States, does "take direct action against terrorists" (Washington Post, Feb. 4).

'And "if we think that direct action will involve killing an American, we get specific permission to do that."

'Glenn Greenwald, a former constitutional lawyer turned news analyst, avoids euphemisms. "Special permissions" without judicial authorization, says Greenwald, amounts to "basically giving the president the power to impose death sentences on his own citizens without any charges or trial" (Salon.com, Feb. 4).'

666 The beast finally identified

Meet Your Strawman!

By Barbara H. Peterson

We knew that CODEX was right around the corner, and here it is, live and in color. Barry Soetoro, AKA Barack Hussein Obama, Imposter in Chief, on June 10, 2010, issued an Executive Order – Establishing the National Prevention, Health Promotion, and Public Health Council. In short, the CODEX council. The entire Executive Order is attached, but please read this part and understand just what it is saying:

“Section 6 (g) contains specific plans to ensure that all prevention programs outside the Department of Health and Human Services are based on the science-based guidelines developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention under subsection (d) of this section.”

In other words, ALL prevention programs, even those outside of the umbrella of the Department of Health and Human Services, must align with CDC guidelines, which are “science-based.” What do we take for prevention? Herbs and vitamins. Herbs that you grow in your backyard and vitamins that are not approved by your doctor do not fall under these “science-based” guidelines, and are not allowed. Therefore, this will effectively open the door to outlawing ALL disease prevention practices that use herbs and vitamins not prescribed by a doctor, and implement CODEX ALIMENTARIUS right here in the good old U.S.A. Thank you, Semra Orhon Hughes, for the heads up!

In full survivingthemiddleclasscrash.wordpress.com/2010/06/14/barry-soetoro-imposter-in-chief-implements-codex-alimentarius-by-executive-order-in-the-u-s/

INDEPENDENCE DAY FAIL USA

JOIN THE MOVEMENT TO FREE NORWAY

An Egyptian courier whom had good relations with the Greeks spoke with the Spartan leadership in order to get them to GIVE IN to Xerxes. Here is what transpired:

EGYPTIAN: "Listen to me my brothers. The race of Egyptians is an ancient one, numbering the generations of it's fathers by the hundreds into antiquity. We have seen empires come and go. We have ruled and been ruled. Even now, we are technically a conquered people, we serve the Persians. Yet regard my station ,friends. Do I look poor?, Is my demeanor dishonored? Peer here into my purse. With all respect, brothers, I could buy and sell you and all you own with only that which I bear upon my person"

At that point Olympeius (one of the Spartan military brass) demanded that the Egyptian speak his point. EGYPTIAN: "My point is this, friends: His Majesty will honor you Spartans no less than us Egyptians, or any other great warrior people, should you see wisdom and enlist yourselves voluntarily beneath his banner. In the East we have learned that which you Greeks have not. The wheel turns, and man must turn with it. To resist is not mere folly, but madness"

Dienekes (Spartan General): "You have never tasted freedom my friend, or you would know that it is purchased not with gold but with STEEL................and as for the wheel you speak of........like any other.........it turns BOTH ways.

GOVERNMENT IS BASED UPON MUTUAL TRUST--NEVER TRUST YOUR GOVERNMENT AND GOVERNMENT MUST TRUST IN IT'S OWN PEOPLE TO MAKE THEIR OWN DECISIONS IN LIFE

THE ANSWER TO 1984 IS 1776

<<<<WATCH BOTH>>>>>

IBM VERICHIP AND THE FOURTH REICH

Cop Talks About FEMA Camps & Red Blue Dots

More Secrets, More Surveillance, Less Security

A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

Arizona Sheriff: ‘Our Own Government Has Become Our Enemy’
Monday, August 02, 2010
By Penny Starr, Senior Staff Writer
CNSNews.com) – Pinal County (Ariz.) Sheriff Paul Babeu is hopping mad at the federal government.

Babeu told CNSNews.com that rather than help law enforcement in Arizona stop the hundreds of thousands of people who come into the United States illegally, the federal government is targeting the state and its law enforcement personnel.

“What’s very troubling is the fact that at a time when we in law enforcement and our state need help from the federal government, instead of sending help they put up billboard-size signs warning our citizens to stay out of the desert in my county because of dangerous drug and human smuggling and weapons and bandits and all these other things and then, behind that, they drag us into court with the ACLU,” Babeu said.

The sheriff was referring to the law suits filed by the American Civil Liberties Union and the U.S. Department of Justice challenging the state’s new immigration law.

“So who has partnered with the ACLU?” Babeu said in a telephone interview with CNSNews.com. “It’s the president and (Attorney General) Eric Holder himself. And that’s simply outrageous.”

Last week, U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton placed a temporary injunction on portions of the bill that allowed law enforcement personnel during the course of a criminal investigation who have probable cause to think an individual is in the country illegally to check immigration status. The state of Arizona filed an appeal on Thursday with the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.

“Our own government has become our enemy and is taking us to court at a time when we need help,” Babeu said.

Babeu and Sheriff Larry Dever of Cochise County Ariz., spoke by phone with CNSNews.com last week about the May 17 ACLU class-action lawsuit, which charges the law uses racial profiling and named the county attorneys and sheriffs in all 15 Arizona counties as defendants. The Department of Justice filed a lawsuit on July 6, charging the Arizona law preempted the federal government’s sole right to enforce immigration law.

“If the president would do his job and secure the border; send 3,000 armed soldiers to the Arizona border and stop the illegal immigration and the drug smuggling and the violence, we wouldn’t even be in this position and where we’re forced to take matters into our own hands,” Babeu said.
Dever said the federal government’s failure to secure the border and its current thwarting of Arizona’s effort to control illegal immigration within its borders has implications for the entire country.

“The bigger picture is while what’s going on in Arizona is critically important, what comes out of this and happens here will affect our entire nation in terms of our ability to protect our citizenry from a very serious homeland security threat,” Dever said. “People who are coming across the border in my county aren’t staying there. They’re going everywhere USA and a lot of them are bad, bad people.”

According to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), about 250,000 people were detained in Arizona in the last 12 months for being in the country illegally. Babeu said that that number only reflects the number of people detained and that thousands more enter the country illegally each year.

The CBP also reports that 17 percent of those detained already have a criminal record in the United States.

Both Babeu and Dever said they want to remain involved in the legal battle over the law, which many experts predict will end up being decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Dever has hired an independent attorney to represent him in the ACLU case and his attorney has already filed a motion of intervention in the DOJ lawsuit so the “(Dever) will have a seat at the table.”

A Web site also has been launched by the non-profit, Iowa-based Legacy Foundation to raise money for the Babeu’s and Dever’s legal defense.

Both men said they believe the outcome of the case has national significance.“For us, this is a public safety matter and a national security threat,” Babeu said.

Steve Watson
Infowars.com
August 2, 2010

Minority Report targeted ads‘The Minority Report’, a dystopian short story by Philip K. Dick, was written as a stark warning of what may happen in the future should society be engulfed by invasive technology and begin to regard privacy and civil liberties as antiquated.

Of course the artistic intention is always going to go straight over the heads of some people, including, it seems, today’s real life technological executives who are developing the exact same kind of devices the iconic author imagined would plague shopping malls of the future.

In a memorable scene from the story and the 2002 movie, starring Tom Cruise, the lead character walks through such a place only to be bombarded with personalised adverts from digital billboards telling him he could use a Guinness or a holiday to forget his troubles.
‘How awful’, you and I would automatically think. ‘How wonderful’, researchers have concluded at IBM, the company that, incidentally, previously facilitated Hitler’s death-camp punchcard tabulation system.

“IBM claims that its technology will help prevent consumers from being subjected to a barrage of irritating advertising because they will only be shown adverts for products that are relevant to them.” reports the London Telegraph.

“In the film, the billboards rely on scanning the person’s eyeball,” Brian Innes, a research scientist at IBM’s innovation laboratories said. “…but we are using RFID technology that people are carrying around with them, so they can have a tailor made message.”

RFID chips are now commonly embedded in mobile phones, credit cards, shopping loyalty cards and even clothes.

The chips can be coded with personal information that readers can scan. The type of advertising will be determined on the basis of what your chip says your buying habits are, thus allowing advertising boards to personally and intimately target any passer by.

A spokesman for the Advertising Association, the industry body that represents advertisers, said: “Outdoor RFID advertising is an exciting prospect for the industry. Ads can be made more relevant to the consumer and it will boost interest in the medium”.
Indeed, this kind of advertising has already been rolled out, and we can only expect more sophisticated versions of it to emerge in the near future.

We have previously covered the fact that private industry and eventually government are set to implement plans to use microphones and cameras in the computers and TiVo style boxes of hundreds of millions of Americans to monitor their lifestyle choices and build psychological profiles, which will be used for invasive advertising and data mining.

In 2006, Google announced that they would use in-built microphones to listen in on user’s background noise, be it television, music or radio – and then direct advertising at them based on their preferences.

“The idea is to use the existing PC microphone to listen to whatever is heard in the background, be it music, your phone going off or the TV turned down. The PC then identifies it, using fingerprinting, and then shows you relevant content, whether that’s adverts or search results, or a chat room on the subject,” reported the Register.
In 2008 Comcast Vice-President Gerard Kunkel admitted to a journalist that the use of inbuilt monitoring devices in cable boxes would represent a “holy grail,” and rival companies like TiVo and Microsoft have already filed patents for similar technology.

Hundreds of millions will all be potential targets for secret surveillance and the subsequent sell-off of all their information to unscrupulous data mining corporations and government agencies.

The report cites the inevitability that the use and abuse of this technology will eventually be taken over by the state.

“Pretty soon the security industry is going to find a way to hijack the Google feed and use it for full on espionage,” states the article. Thus the state gains a trendy method of constant, cradle-to-grave surveillance.

If you think telesales calls and pop-ups ads are annoying, wait until this new wave of invasive advertising really takes off. It threatens to not only saturate the senses with 24/7 vapid consumerism, but will also signal the death knell for the assumption that privacy is a human right not to be infringed upon by corporations or the state.

Unless the stark warnings of Philip K. Dick and other sociological analysts like him are taken seriously, we will find ourselves living out the realities that previously only emerged from the darkest recesses of their minds.

UPDATED AUG 26, 2010

‘Minority Report’ Ad Billboards To Address Consumers By Name

Secrets of the CIA

From the Wilderness - The CIA Connection

CIA Drug Ops Conspiracy

RESISTANCE TO TYRANTS IS OBEDIANCE TO GOD

GOVERNMENT BY THE PEOPLE FOR THE PEOPLE