THE QUALE LENZLESS GENERATOR
ABOVE IMAGE IS A CLICKABLE LINK TO THE LENZLESS GENERATOR PAGE
PAGE WILL BE UPDATED AS MORE DETAILS ARE DEVELOPED. IF YOU HAVE ANY INPUT PLEASE USE THE E-MAIL ADDRESS BELOW
You may also join my group in order to submit your suggestions and anything else that you would like to add to my website that would be helpful
MAGNETIC FIELDS ARE ORIENTED TO REPEL EACH OTHER NOT ATTRACT EACH OTHER. THIS IS VERY IMPOTANT TO SUCCESSFUL OPERATION OF THIS GENERATOR. THIS MAKES IT "LENZLESS" AS WELL AS "DRAGLESS" IT FREELY ROTATES USING RING MAGNETS WHETHER LOADED OR NOT. ALSO SHOWS SPEEDING UP UNDER LOAD SHOWING THE ABILITY TO BECOME A SELF-POWERING DESIGN SOMEDAY. REAL OVERUNITY IS POSSIBLE WITH PROPER CONSTRUCTION.
FIELD FROM MAGNETS IS DIVERTED BY INDUCTORS, CREATING AN ALTERNATING FIELD IN CORE MATERIAL
THE QUALE LENZLESS GENERATOR
INDUCTORS ARE NEVER PULLED AWAY FROM RING MAGNETS AND ARE ALWAYS REPELLED BY COILS THUS AVOIDING LENZ'S LAW DRAG
MY LENZLESS GENERATOR BELOW
BERTINE ZETLITZ
Doc 2a complete
Adjacent to one ring of the magnets and separated by an air gap are parallel mounted induction coils (111A) corresponding to and aligned with the magnets (113). On the other end of the coils, (111A) are an identical set of magnets (113) arranged in the same manner as the first set, but the polarity is reversed in respect to the coil (111A)
Thus if on one of the end plates (123) the magnetic pole facing the coil (111A) is the (N) pole than on the opposite end plate (123A) the (S) pole will face the coil (111A) Fig. 13.
The rotor (109A or 109B) and it’s configuration is the same as in the first variant (see*), and the induction of AC current, occurring in the same manner and in the same order as described before. This assembly can be constructed in any practical multiple units of the above (123A).
Adjacent to one ring of the magnets and separated by an air gap are parallel mounted induction coils (111A) corresponding to and aligned with the magnets (113). On the other end of the coils, (111A) are an identical set of magnets (113) arranged in the same manner as the first set, but the polarity is reversed in respect to the coil (111A)
Thus if on one of the end plates (123) the magnetic pole facing the coil (111A) is the (N) pole than on the opposite end plate (123A) the (S) pole will face the coil (111A) Fig. 13.
The rotor (109A or 109B) and it’s configuration is the same as in the first variant (see*), and the induction of AC current, occurring in the same manner and in the same order as described before. This assembly can be constructed in any practical multiple units of the above (123A).
IT HAS COME TO MY ATTENTION THAT MY DESIGN RESEMBLES MR FRANCOEUR'S DESIGN. BUT THE ONE IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE THAT MAKES MINE "LENZLESS" IS IN THE ORIENTATION OF THE MAGNETS ON EACH END. MINE ARE ORIENTED TO REPEL EACH OTHER. THIS ELIMINATES ALL LENZ LAW RELATED EFFECTS AS WELL AS MAGNETIC DRAG. I HAVE INCLUDED SOME OF HIS DRAWINGS FROM THE LINKS BELOW FOR COMPARISON.
BELOW IS MY SIMPLIFIED VERSION FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES
FRANCOEUR COIL ORIENTATION
Mr. Francoeur spent a lot of time and money on his generator but apparently had little success. There is limited public disclosure about the output, just statements (UNVERIFIED) of how the motor got hot and the coils stayed cool. This is what I would expect of a generator that is hard to turn and little electrical output. My generator has no detectable magnetic drag at any time. It seems to me he gave away a generator that didn't work very well. I never saw his work until after I filed my patent and went public. I started with the premise of repelling fields and evolved the design from there. My design works because of the repelling fields concept. Mr. Francoeur used the typical attraction mode used in most generators without ever trying the repulsion method. If he had he might have discovered my design. IN ADDITION THERE IS NO VIDEO OF HIS GENERATOR VERSION AVAILABLE TO MY KNOWLEDGE . HE HAS CALLED ME A FRAUD IN AT LEAST ONE GROUP. FOR WHAT? I HAVE POSTED VIDEOS OF MY GENERATOR IN OPERATION, HE HAS NOT. WHY? I BELIEVE THAT HIS DID NOT WORK VERY WELL, AND WAS NOT A LENZLESS DESIGN. MINE CERTAINLY DIFFERS IN THESE IMPORTANT RESPECTS. AS OF YET I HAVE RECIEVED NO APOLOGY, I HAVE APOLOGIZED FOR NOT SEEING SOME OF HIS PRIOR ART BEFORE AND THINKING HE WAS SOME KIND OF NUTCASE. (Maybe I apologized for too much)
I JUST WANT TO MAKE CLEAR THAT MY DESIGN WORKS ON A DIFFERENT SET OF PRINCIPLES THAT MAKES MY GENERATOR "LENZLESS" AND IS CAPABLE GOOD OUTPUT WITH LITTLE INPUT TORQUE REQUIRED. MY GENERATOR HAS NO DETECTABLE MAGNETIC DRAG WHILE IN OPERATION
================>>
FRANCOEUR DRAWING
FRANCOEUR DRAWING
================>>
================>>
Statements below made by Mr Francoeur taken from http://www.angelfire.com/ak5/energy21/interference.htm
"Any one is free to develop and use this technology for the benefit of all in need. I have covered a lot of ground and research in developing the Interference Disc Generator thus far, including replicating the Gary W. Wesley permanent magnet motor. A lot of the home work has been done for you, but more work and refining is needed to perfect the Interference Disc Generator for the ultimate goal of producing an overunity self regenerating permanent magnet machine."
Mr Francoeur STATES; ..."Any one is free to develop and use this technology for the benefit of all in need. "
PLEASE DONATE ==>>
YOUR SUPPORT WILL HELP ME TO KEEP GOING
More info on this dispute on the link below
OPERATING PRINCIPLE
HE GAVE THIS TO HUMANITY BUT IS UPSET THAT SOMEONE ACTUALLY MADE SOMETHING LIKE IT NOW? EVEN THOUGH MINE USES A DIFFERENT OPERATING PRINCIPLE WHICH COMPLETELY CHANGES IT'S PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS.
MAYBE HE DIDN'T WANT ANYONE TO SHOW HOW CLOSE HE CAME TO SOMETHING THAT WORKED OR HOW BADLY HIS VERSION WORKED. THIS WOULD EXPOSE HIM AS BEING DISINGENUOUS BACK THEN ABOUT IT OR IS HE STILL TRYING TO IMPLY THAT IT WORKED BETTER THAN HE COULD SHOW? MR. FRANCOEUR SHOW A VIDEO! STILL WAITING TO SEE A VIDEO OF HIS VERSION BUILT YEARS AGO.
MAYBE HE DIDN'T WANT ANYONE TO SHOW HOW CLOSE HE CAME TO SOMETHING THAT WORKED OR HOW BADLY HIS VERSION WORKED. THIS WOULD EXPOSE HIM AS BEING DISINGENUOUS BACK THEN ABOUT IT OR IS HE STILL TRYING TO IMPLY THAT IT WORKED BETTER THAN HE COULD SHOW? MR. FRANCOEUR SHOW A VIDEO! STILL WAITING TO SEE A VIDEO OF HIS VERSION BUILT YEARS AGO.
I ALSO FOUND THAT YOU MUST ALLOW ENOUGH SPACE BETWEEN THE INDUCTORS FOR THE MAGNETIC FIELDS TO GET PAST THE INDUCTORS TO THE COIL CORES. IN THIS ILLUSTRATION I BELEIVE THAT LITTLE FLUX WOULD BE ALLOWED PAST THE INDUCTORS TO THE COILS ======>>>>
NO DRAG AT ALL IN MY DESIGN NONE "ZERO" I CAN'T EMPHASIZE THIS ENOUGH!
Mr Francoeur did not make a no drag generator, it had a huge amount of magnetic drag.
Mr Francoeur did not make a no drag generator, it had a huge amount of magnetic drag.
NO MAGNETIC DRAG
CAUSES MAGNETIC DRAG
ALTHOUGH THIS LOOKS SIMILAR TO MINE HE DRESCRIBES USING INDIVIDUAL MAGNETS MOUNTED ON METAL RINGS
MAGNETS==>
IRON INDUCTORS=======>>>
CORE/COILS========>>>
AXLE===>>
THIS PICTURE IS A LINK TO MY CRYSTAL SKULL PROPHECY PAGES
INDUCTORS ARE REPELLED BOTH APPROACHING AND LEAVING CORES BUT ARE REPELLED MORE STRONGLY LEAVING IF CURRENT IS DRAWN FROM COILS OR COILS ARE SHORTED.
MUST SEE!
MOVIES
VERY LITTLE DETAIL CAN BE FOUND ON THE OPERATING PRINCIPLE BY HIM AND NO VIDEOS OF IT OPERATING
UPDATED APRIL 07, 2012
browser caching disabled
MR. FRANCOER BETRAYS ALL WHO WANT FREE ENERGY WITH HIS FALSE ACCUSATIONS AND CLAIMS. YOU MR. FRANCOEUR SHOULD BE ASHAMED FOR EXPOSING YOURSELF AS DISENGENUOUS AND JEALEOUS.
ALL LINKS ON THIS SITE TESTED SAFE WITH MCAFEE SITEADVISOR
WEBSITE VIEWED BEST IN FIREFOX 3.6.28