LINK TO EYE ON THE WORLD BELOW
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/overunitybuilders
You may also join my group in order to submit your suggestions and anything else that you would like to add to my website that would be helpful
MY YOU TUBE CHANNEL
LINK TO EYE ON THE USA BELOW
http://www.infowars.com/bombshell-silverstein-wanted-to-demolish-building-7-on-911/
LINK TO EYE ON NORWAY BELOW
Loading...
SEARCH FOR BOOKS ABOUT THE WORLD WIDE CONSPIRACY BELOW
LOOSE CHANGE
911 THE GREATEST LIE EVER SOLD
911 IN PLANE SITE (DIRECTORS CUT) FULL LENGTH MOVIE
911 THE ROAD TO TYRANNY
Alex Jones - Martial Law 911
EXTERNAL LINKS
http://www.martiallawsurvival.com/
http://sianews.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=2861
http://www.wikihow.com/Make-a-Martial-Law-Survival-Pack
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=16512.0;wap2
MARTIAL LAW SURVIVAL
THE REAL NEWS
http://www.campaignforliberty.com/
SUPPORT FREEDOM FROM TRYANNY
THIS PICTURE IS A LINK TO MY CRYSTAL SKULL PROPHECY PAGES
http://www.reopen911.org/
http://911citizenswatch.org/
6 OF THE 10, 911 COMMISSIONERS CLAIM THE COMMISSION REPORT WAS A COVERUP
Respected Middle East expert and former BBC presenter Alan Hart has broken his silence on 9/11, by revealing that the world’s most prominent civil engineering company told him directly that the collapse of the twin towers was a controlled demolition.
Speaking on the Kevin Barrett show yesterday, Hart said he thought the 9/11 attack probably started as a Muslim operation headed up by Osama Bin Laden but that the plot was subsequently hijacked and carried out by Mossad agents in collusion with elements of the CIA, adding that since its formation, Israel has penetrated every Arab government and terrorist organization.

“My guess is that at an early point they said to the bad guys in the CIA – hey this operation’s running what do we do, and the zionists and the neo-cons said let’s use it,” said Hart, making reference to how top neo-cons like Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz and their fellow Project For a New American Century authors had called for a “catastrophic and catalyzing event––like a new Pearl Harbor,” the year before 9/11.

“The twin towers were brought down by a controlled ground explosion, not the planes,” said Hart, adding that this view was based on his close friendship with consultants who work with the world’s leading civil engineering and construction firm.

Hart asked the company to study the collapse of the twin towers, after which they told him directly, “There’s absolutely no doubt whatsoever that the towers were brought down by a controlled ground explosion.”
Hart then explained how the five dancing Israelis seen celebrating the attack on the World Trade Center in New Jersey as it unfolded, who turned out to be Mossad agents, proves at at a minimum Israel knew the attack was going to happen. Hart went further in speculating that the planes had been fitted with transponders and that the Israelis were guiding them in to the towers.

Host Barrett pointed out that to carry out the successful controlled demolition of three of the biggest buildings in history, the conspirators would have to ensure that they were hit, making the use of remote controlled airliners a distinct possibility. In addition, Barrett mentioned the fact that he had interviewed numerous pilots who dismissed the chances of accurately guiding a huge commercial airliner into a building while flying at sea level at around 600 miles per hour, especially considering the alleged 9/11 hijackers struggled to even fly basic Cessna light aircraft.

“Sounding a chilling note, Hart added that the U.S. is in grave danger of an Israeli-instigated false-flag nuclear attack, perhaps using an American nuclear weapon stolen from Minot Air Force Base during the “loose nukes” rogue operation of August, 2007. The motive would be to trigger a U.S. war with Iran, and perhaps to finish the ethnic cleansing of Palestine under cover of war–which Hart is convinced the Zionists are planning to do as soon as the opportunity presents itself,” writes host Barratt.
Given his biography and standing, Hart’s comments are not to be taken lightly. Hart is a former Middle East Chief Correspondent for ITN News and has also presented for BBC Panorama specializing in the Middle East. He was also a war reporter in Vietnam and the first journalist to reach Suez Canal with the Israeli army in 1967. Over the decades, Hart has developed close relationships with numerous high profile political figures, including the Shah of Iran, Yasser Arafat and Shimon Peres.

Hart has been a successful author for years and has no reason to fabricate the fact that a top construction firm told him point blank that the towers were brought down in a controlled demolition.

In forwarding this information, Hart joins legions of other credible experts who to some extent or other have all publicly challenged the official 9/11 story, with many outright stating that the attacks were an inside job, people like 20-year decorated CIA veteran Robert Baer, who told a radio host that “the evidence points at” 9/11 having had aspects of being an inside job.

In addition, no less than 1198 architectural and engineering specialists have signed a petition demanding Congress re-open an official investigation into the 9/11 attack and the collapse of the twin towers.
FOLLOW THE MONEY-WHO PROFITED FROM 911?   SEARCH--"BUZZY CRONGARD PUT OPTIONS"
As seen in this revealing photo, the Twin Towers' destruction exhibited all of the characteristics of destruction by explosives:
   1. Destruction proceeds through the path of greatest resistance at nearly free-fall acceleration
   2. Improbable symmetry of debris distribution
   3. Extremely rapid onset of destruction
   4. Over 100 first responders reported explosions and flashes
   5. Multi-ton steel sections ejected laterally
   6. Mid-air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete & metal decking
   7. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic-like clouds
   8. 1200-foot-dia. debris field: no "pancaked" floors found
   9. Isolated explosive ejections 20 – 40 stories below demolition front
  10. Total building destruction: dismemberment of steel frame
  11. Several tons of molten metal found under all 3 high-rises
  12. Evidence of thermite incendiaries found by FEMA in steel samples
  13. Evidence of explosives found in dust samples
  14. No precedent for steel-framed high-rise collapse due to fire
And exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire, i.e.
   1. Slow onset with large visible deformations
   2. Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, intact, from the point of plane impact, to the side most damaged by the fires)
   3. Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel
   4. High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never “collapsed”
http://www.ae911truth.org/
WTC Building #7, a 47-story high-rise not hit by an airplane, exhibited all the characteristics of classic controlled demolition with explosives:
1.   Rapid onset of "collapse"
2.   Sounds of explosions at ground floor - a second before the building's destruction
3.   Symmetrical "structural failure" -- through the path of greatest resistance -- at free-fall acceleration
4.   Imploded, collapsing completely, and landed in its own footprint
5.   Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic dust clouds
6.   Expert corroboration from the top European Controlled Demolition professional
7.   Fore-knowledge of "collapse" by media, NYPD, FDNY
The in the aftermath of WTC7's destruction, strong evidence of demolition using incendary devices was discovered:
8. FEMA finds rapid oxidation and intergranular melting on structural steel samples
9. Several tons of molten metal reported by numerous highly-qualified witnesses
10. Chemical signature of thermite (high tech incendiary) found in solidified molten metal, and dust samples
WTC7 exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire, i.e.
1.   Slow onset with large visible deformations
2.   Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, to the side most damaged by the fires)
3.   Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel
4.   High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never "collapsed".
SEPTEMBER CLUES new 2008 COMPLETE
Well-Timed Scandal Implication Pushing 9/11 Able-Danger Whistle Blower Weldon Out of House
http://www.wtc7.net/
  Building 7 - Gone in 7 - WHAT YOU ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO KNOW ABOUT 9/11 !!
MUST SEE!
MOVIES
Fair Use Notice
This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity's problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems.
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information.
Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make 'fair use' of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
You can read more about 'fair use' and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School.
The Great Conspiracy The 9 11 News Special You Never SaW (2005)
For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high [places].   Ephesians 6:12 KJ VERSION
http://www.disclose.tv/
WTC 7 Explosion
NIST Explosions
Newly obtained 9/11 eyewitness footage that NIST fought tooth and nail to keep secret contains what appears to be the sound of explosions coming from the vicinity of WTC 7 after the collapse of the twin towers, offering yet more startling evidence that the building, which was not hit by a plane yet collapsed demolition style, was deliberately imploded.

The clip was released by NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) as part of a 3 terabyte package of video and photo data in response to a lawsuit brought by the International Center for 9/11 Studies. As we highlighted in our previous report, almost every single video studied as part of the release thus far contains damning evidence of controlled demolition on both the twin towers and WTC 7.

The fact that
NIST dragged their feet for so long in an attempt to block the release of these highly incriminating videos clearly indicates that they were part of an attempted cover-up. In addition, the fact that some of the videos appear to have been edited in an effort to hide evidence of controlled demolition is another smoking gun.

The latest video is from eyewitness Richard Peskin, who filmed ground zero from a high rise building that appears to be about a dozen blocks down the street from Building 7. The first portion of the footage is filmed immediately after the collapse of the second tower of the World Trade Center. At about 10 seconds into the clip,
two clear explosions can be heard.

The clip then cuts to a later time and the cameraman states, “…explosion or something because there’s a lot of police activity and sirens and more smoke rising from the ground – new smoke – so there was some kind of additional explosion but I don’t know what it was….maybe it was a federal building or something like that,” as the camera pans across a shot of WTC 7.
At around 11am – around half an hour after the collapse of the north tower of the World Trade Center and an hour after the collapse of the south tower, Peskin states, “I still hear continuing explosions, I don’t know what it is,” as small explosions can be heard in the background.

At 1:49 in the clip, a louder rumbling explosion can clearly be heard coming from the direction of WTC 7 – “That’s another explosion,” says Peskin.

The clip was contained in the NIST folder named “Richard Peskin” and is a combination of footage from the files Peskin 25.avi, Peskin 28.avi, Peskin 29.avi, and Peskin 30.avi.

The fact that NIST tried to sit on the footage for months even after a FOIA request and that it took a lawsuit filed by the International Center for 9/11 Studies to obtain the clip clearly indicates that the organization wanted to keep the sound of explosions coming from the vicinity of WTC 7 out of the public record. The footage is filmed from a significant distance away from the scene and shows no detail of anything that could be considered sensitive. The only remarkable thing about the video is the fact that it contains the sound of secondary explosions, something NIST has continually denied was a contributory factor to the collapse of either the twin towers or WTC 7.

In another clip released as part of the same lawsuit, a loud, low-frequency boom can be heard just before the east penthouse of WTC 7 falls. Once the support columns that held up the penthouse are taken out, the rest of the building falls almost within its own footprint.
However, in subsequent clips released by NIST, where the camera is located nearer to the building, the collapse of the penthouse is clearly edited out of the footage.

“Several clips from the Cumulus database show signs of editing. In the two video clips below, the collapse of the penthouse of World Trade Center 7 is cut out of the video. These videos happen to have been filmed from close to WTC 7, and have a high quality soundtrack that would have picked up explosion sounds from the charges that severed the columns supporting the penthouse, especially the explosion heard in the last video clip presented,” comments the International Center for 9/11 Studies.
Why is NIST trying to deliberately cover-up evidence of explosions preceding the collapse of WTC 7?

The 9/11 Commission completely ignored the hundreds of survivors, professionals, first responders, firefighters and police who reported numerous secondary explosions at all levels of the twin towers and WTC 7.

NIST’s final report on WTC 7 concluded that the never before observed “new phenomenon” of “thermal expansion” was to blame for the destruction of the building, a completely ludicrous conclusion in a report that completely ignored eyewitness testimony and hard evidence that indicated deliberate demolition of the structure.

As we documented for several years, the collapse of WTC 7 is the smoking gun confirming that the official story behind 9/11 is bogus. The collapse of Building 7 was reported before it happened by several news stations, including BBC and CNN.

If the collapse of WTC 7 came as a result of a “new phenomenon” and an “extraordinary event” that had never happened before in the history of building collapses, then why did news stations and ground zero workers know it was about to happen an hour or more in advance?

Explosions in Building 7 were also reported by eyewitnesses inside the building, including Barry Jennings, who described a “big explosion” that blew him back to the 8th floor.
Former NYPD officer Craig Bartmer was in the immediate vicinity of Building 7 before its collapse at approximately 5:20pm.

“I walked around it (Building 7). I saw a hole. I didn’t see a hole bad enough to knock a building down, though,” said Bartmer. “Yeah there was definitely fire in the building, but I didn’t hear any… I didn’t hear any creaking, or… I didn’t hear any indication that it was going to come down. And all of a sudden the radios exploded and everyone started screaming ‘get away, get away, get away from it!’… It was at that moment… I looked up, and it was nothing I would ever imagine seeing in my life. The thing started pealing in on itself… Somebody grabbed my shoulder and I started running, and the shit’s hitting the ground behind me, and the whole time you’re hearing “boom, boom, boom, boom, boom.” I think I know an explosion when I hear it… Yeah it had some damage to it, but nothing like what they’re saying… Nothing to account for what we saw… I am shocked at the story we’ve heard about it to be quite honest.”

Other EMTs and first responders were also told that Building 7 was to be deliberately demolished, including Emergency Medical Technician Indira Singh - another whistleblower
“After midday on 9/11 we had to evacuate that because they told us Building 7 was coming down. If you had been there, not being able to see very much just flames everywhere and smoke – it is entirely possible – I do believe that they brought Building 7 down because I heard that they were going to bring it down because it was unstable because of the collateral damage,” said Singh.

Asked who told her that the building was to be “brought down,” Singh responded, “The fire department. And they did use the words ‘we’re gonna have to bring it down’ and for us there observing the nature of the devastation it made total sense to us that this was indeed a possibility, given the subsequent controversy over it I don’t know.”

Another EMT named Mike who wished to remain anonymous wrote in a letter to the Loose Change film crew that emergency responders were told Building 7 was about to be “pulled” and that a 20 second radio countdown preceded its collapse.

“There were bright flashes up and down the sides of Building 7, you could see them through the windows…and it collapsed. We all knew it was intentionally pulled… they told us,” he stated.

Following news reports in the days after the attack that Building 7 had collapsed due to fire damage, Mike fully expected this mistake to be corrected after the chaos had subsided, but was astonished when it became part of the official story.
Painful Deceptions 2005-The U.S. Government orchestrated the 9/11 attacks!
EUROPEAN UNION
LINK TO EYE ON THE EU BELOW
LINK TO EYE ON THE UN BELOW
911 with CIA Cover Up
911 Ripple Effect
1:26:44
The film that's being hailed as the most professionally produced and up to date 9/11 video ever made... See it for free
LINK TO EYE ON THE UK BELOW
http://buildingwhat.org/
UPDATED SEP 20, 2015
danish scientist Niels Harrit, on nano-thermite in the WTC dust ( english subtitles )
Demolition Access to WTC Buildings exposed
http://www.coreofcorruption.com/
http://www.newworldorderreport.com/
http://www.coreofcorruption.com/
911 Missing Links
911 The Musical - Full Version - Deek Jackson
UFOTV Presents...: Welcome To Terrorland - 9/11, Mohamed Atta and the Venice Flying Circus
Red Alert | Next Possible False Flag US Terrorist Attack: Willis Sears Tower Chicago
http://www.infiniteunknown.net/2011/01/11/cia-asset-susan-lindauer-blows-the-whistle-on-911-iraq/
http://www.infiniteunknown.net/
browser caching disabled
The NIST WTC 7 Report is False
ALL LINKS ON THIS SITE TESTED SAFE WITH MCAFEE SITEADVISOR
Core of Corruption Documentary "In the Shadows"
Painful Deceptions ( Full Length )
9/11: A Conspiracy Theory
FOLLOW THE MONEY
A COVERUP IS ALMOST ALWAYS EVIDENCE OF A CRIME
9/11 EXPOSED, Researched facts and analysis- Full Documentary.
911 Eyewitness proves that the U.S. Government orchestrated the 9/11 attacks!
CIA WhistleBlower EXPOSES Everything! "Extreme Prejudice"
A Plane Did Not Hit The Pentagon On 9/11
HOLE IN PENTAGON BEFORE THE REST COLLAPSED
The NEW Remember Building 7 Television Ad
CIA Insider Tells 911 truth. Time to re-examine your World-view, America!
WEBSITE VIEWED BEST IN FIREFOX OR CHROME
http://earnfreedoges.com/
9 11 THE BIGGEST LIE 2nd EDITION
ALL ADVERTISERS  OR SPONSORS  CONTACT ME AT =>>
IF YOU USE THIS EMAIL FOR ANY PERSONAL REASON YOU MUST DONATE $20 USD TO GET A REPLY, INCLUDE TRAXN #. MY TIME IS VALUABLE, JOIN MY GROUP FOR QUESTIONS ABOUT MY TECHNOLOGIES.
IF YOU USE THIS EMAIL FOR ANY PERSONAL REASON YOU MUST DONATE $20 USD TO GET A REPLY, INCLUDE TRAXN #. MY TIME IS VALUABLE, JOIN MY GROUP FOR QUESTIONS ABOUT MY TECHNOLOGIES.
9/11 The Great Conspiracy - The 9/11 News Special
The Battle of Vienna, September Eleven 1683